Former
President Bill Clinton tells BBC News that political rhetoric should not
"degenerate into demonization," but that nobody intends to encourage
the sort of violence that occurred in Arizona.
But he also
says that the anger in the country is rising and the House should lead the way
in toning down the rhetoric, which can take on an unintended life in the
"echo chamber" of the Internet.
In an interview
from a Haitian refugee camp on the eve of the one-year anniversary of the quake
there, Clinton said that he could see the level
of anger in the country rising and wrote about that in an essay last April,
according to a transcript of the interview supplied by the BBC.
"I think
this is an occasion for us to reaffirm that our political differences shouldn't
degenerate into demonization of the sense that, you know, if you don't agree
with me you're not a good American," Clinton said. "I think that
that's what I'd like to see, I'd like to see the House of Representatives lead
the way."
While he did
not say whether he thought such angry rhetoric could prompt an unintended
reaction like the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, he did suggest
it, saying "we cannot be unaware of the fact that, particularly with the Internet,
there's this huge echo-chamber out there, and anything any of us says falls on
the unhinged and the hinged alike, and we just have to be sensitive to
it." A number of Democrats have suggested that violent rhetoric, even if it
is simply meant as rhetoric, could still be a trigger for violent action.
But Clinton
also said that no one "intends to do anything that encourages this sort of
behavior," adding that, "I think it is wrong for anyone to suggest
it." The primary argument for toning down the rhetoric, and even the angry
finger-pointing by some Democrats, has not been the suggestion that those
taking rhetorical shots mean for anyone to take them literally, but that
violent rhetoric can incite others to take the meaning literally anyway.
