The dueling broadband bill introductions from Democrats and Republicans this week continued Friday with more than a half-dozen offerings from both sides.
On the Democratic side, Reps. Doris Matsui (D-Calif.) and Susan Brooks (R-Ind.) introduced H.R. 4847, the Broadband Deployment Streamlining Act, whose intent is to speed deployment by "reforming and improving" the application process for building out broadband using public lands.
Last week, President Donald Trump signed two executive order to do just that.
The Democratic bill:
1) "requires procedures to be established for tracking applications, monitoring the time between receipt and final decision, and reasons for denial;
2) "bases application fees that applicants pay to the designated federal agency on the actual costs of review and maintenance of that application;
3) "requires that executive agencies act on siting requests with 270 days; and
4) "preserves agency obligations to follow applicable environmental laws."
The bill would also mandate a Government Accountability Office report on the National Broadband Map, a government effort to identify where broadband is and isn't.
Not to be outdone, Republicans followed with more of their promised broadband bill blitz.
Communications Subcommittee Chairman Marsha Blackburn unveiled five bills Friday, the third tranche of its series of bills, dealing mostly with historic preservation and environmental reviews.
H.R. 4832, “Restoring Economic Strength and Telecommunications Operations by Releasing Expected Dollars (RESTORED) Act,” would allow companies eligible for Universal Service Fund high-cost money to get up to a 7-month advance on the funds in disaster areas.
H.R. 4845, “Connecting Communities Post Disasters Act,” would give facilities in disaster areas a five-year exemption from environmental and historic reviews to allow them to replace/improve their facilities.
H.R. 4842, “The Streamlining Permitting to Enable Efficient Deployment of Broadband Infrastructure,” would exempt environmental and historic preservation reviews on federal property if another facility on the same property has already been granted one; would exempt other such reviews in some other circumstances.
H.R. 4847, “Broadband Deployment Streamlining Act,” would "direct the Secretaries of Interior and Agriculture to issue regulations within one year to streamline applications processes to locate or modify communications facilities on public lands."; "amend Section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act to institute a firm shot clock by which applications must be granted or denied (an application is deemed granted if the agency fails to grant or deny within the allotted time)" and "would require a GAO report evaluating accuracy and reliability of data collected for the National Broadband Map" (mirroring the Democratic bill).
H.Res. 701 would express "the sense of the House" that environmental and historic reviews for broadband buildouts "should be narrowly tailored and proportional to lands that are physically impacted by the deployment of such facilities."
But wait, there was more, and from a combination of Democrat and Republican.
Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) and David McKinley (R-W. Va.) offered up their second broadband bill of the week, the Climb Once Act, which would, they said, ensure that no federal laws got in the way of local "climb once" policies that "allow for a list of pre-approved contractors that pole owners agree on to handle make-ready work, eliminating the need for multiple contractors to perform the work."
