Calif. Court Dismisses Michael Kassan’s Slander Suit Against UTA Lawyer
‘No reasonable trier of fact could interpret [attorney Bryan] Freedman’s statement about Kassan as anything other than a nonactionable statement of opinion,’ judge rules
Former MediaLink head Michael Kassan’s slander and libel suit against a lawyer for UTA has been dismissed.
UTA, which bought MediaLink, and Kassan are in a dispute over Kassan’s management of the latter company. Kassan asserts he resigned because his contract was violated. UTA claims it fired Kassan because of irregular activities.
Kassan sued attorney Bryan Freedman and his firm because Freedman called Kassan a “pathological liar” during an interview published by a trade publication.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Daniel Murphy ruled that “the statement that Kassan was a “pathological liar” was made in the context of a highly publicized, contentious dispute between Kassan and UTA involving allegations in both directions.”
In such a situation, the participants in the dispute could be expected to use “epithets and hyperbole” which an average reader would not take as fact.
“In sum, no reasonable trier of fact could interpret Freedman’s statement about Kassan as anything other than a nonactionable statement of opinion,“ Murphy ruled. “Therefore, Kassan’s defamation claims fail as a matter of law and have no probability of success.”
Broadcasting & Cable Newsletter
The smarter way to stay on top of broadcasting and cable industry. Sign up below
Jon has been business editor of Broadcasting+Cable since 2010. He focuses on revenue-generating activities, including advertising and distribution, as well as executive intrigue and merger and acquisition activity. Just about any story is fair game, if a dollar sign can make its way into the article. Before B+C, Jon covered the industry for TVWeek, Cable World, Electronic Media, Advertising Age and The New York Post. A native New Yorker, Jon is hiding in plain sight in the suburbs of Chicago.